With the development of NSFW AI, or Not Safe For Work Artificial Intelligence several myths and confusions have been born. It is the same with AI systems used to produce adult or filter such content: we mistake what they are capable of. One of the most obvious myths regarding NSF content AI systems is that they can, in fact, accurately judge what kind of material could be considered as inappropriate or appropriate. Nevertheless, research has shown that these AI systems are only 70% to 80% accurate when it comes to identifying obvious explicit content. This leaves a wide margin of error open for misclassification, causing incorrect detection results that are either false positives or negatives.
Another misconception is that type of NSFW AI has limited human inputs and it can operate without oversight. Actually, these AI systems require ongoing monitoring and adjustment. For example, major tech firms like Google and Facebook often have teams of data scientists who work constantly on updating the algorithms to make sure that AI makes better choices. This is because the AI requires large datasets and, if these sets are biased or dated - it affects its performance.[1]
It contributed you know how much to societal desensitization towards explicit content. Though technology plays a tremendous role in shaping societal norms, crediting much of the desensitization only to AI may appear reductionist when one considers other reasons like content access due to the internet and cultural shift. In this broader view, the only impact is happening products of AI but a small part of much larger social change how society interacts with media.
NSFW AI also comes with the speculation that it can operate without a conscience. But the ethics of how one develops and uses these AI systems have come under increasing scrutiny. The service must also be considerate of privacy, consent and abuse. OpenAI, for example, has put in place ethical principles and governance layers to prevent deployment of technologies that are inconsistent with the values corpus of society or harm people.
A similarly misguided belief is that making the AI NSFW-savvy makes content creators or platforms less responsible. Well, the existence of such technology reveals just how critical it is that content delivered to these devices be responsibly managed. NSFW AI integration platforms like Reddit or OnlyFans continue to enforce community guidelines if such services are discovered, and use of the respective reporting path is essential for a safer experience. AI is an assistant to human judgment and moderation, but not a replacement.
A proprietary take on this is the socio-economic ramifications of NSFW AI. This incurs substantive technical debt in building and managing the services. For smaller organizations, more advanced AI solutions can be prohibitively expensive - $100K to millions of dollars a year. This cost barrier serves as a clear reminder that technology is something, which only large corporate entities have access to.
Lastly, the pace of development for NSFW AI is overstated. AI technology is new, but it needs time to reach maturity. It also creates AI models, that stay robust better than something embedded in fosters 3 or more year research and development process. This high bar, however, can also mean that the realistic advancements and timelines of AI innovation fail miserably in comparison - a dynamic which causes disappointment and frustration when unfulfilled or exaggerated predictions related to the progression are not fulfilled right away.
Demystifying these myths can clarify the nature and scope of nsfw ai capabilities. Therefore, it is extremely important to understand the positive and negatives associated with all these technologies in order to take a more balanced view.